Germany, Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, 16 February 2023, 1 BvR 1547/19, 1 BvR 2634/20 – Automated Data Analysis

Case Overview

Share via:

CountryGermany

Deciding BodyHigher National Court

AreaData Protection

UserPublic

Case Name1 BvR 1547/19, 1 BvR 2634/20 - Automated Data Analysis

Authority (English)Federal Constitutional Court of Germany

TechnologyPredictive Analytics

ProviderPrivate

Decision Date16 February 2023

Authority (Original)Bundesverfassungsgericht

Grounds for DecisionNational Law, Human Rights Law

Legal RequirementHuman Oversight, Substantive Fairness (non-discrimination), Lawfulness, Proportionality, Transparency, Accountability

Case Summary

Since 2017, the German State of Hesse has been using a data analytics software, provided by a US Company. A coalition of 11 plaintiffs, including civil society organisations, challenged the system arguing that it facilitates predictive policing to profile individuals as suspects even before a crime has been committed. They questioned the legal foundation of the laws sanctioning these systems, alleging that Hesse and Hamburg failed to specify the data sources available to the police or the extent and criteria for data mining. The Constitutional Court invalidated the laws enabling the police to conduct automated data analysis of stored personal data in Hesse or automated data interpretation in Hamburg. These systems were deemed unconstitutional for breaching the right to informational self-determination.

Access to the full judgment

Further notes on contested technology

  • → AI Technology
  • → Partly Automated-Decision
  • → The technology is deployed

Additional resources

Read the analysis of the case from Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte here: https://freiheitsrechte.org/themen/freiheit-im-digitalen/verfassungsbeschwerde-polizei-verfassungsschutzgesetz-hh

Author of the case note

Moritz Schramm